<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Upperhouse.info</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/</link><description>Upperhouse -  Australian politics, elections, voting and more</description> <language>en-au</language><managingEditor>thespeaker@upperhouse.info</managingEditor><webMaster>thespeaker@upperhouse.info</webMaster><copyright>Copyright 2006 The Speaker</copyright><item><title>McCain&apos;s Daughter&apos;s Blog</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=170</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=170</comments><description>John McCain&apos;s daughter Megan has her own &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mccainblogette.com/index.shtml&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt; which is politics free and offers a unique view inside a presidential campaign.  Very interesting.&lt;P&gt;
</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:24:59 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>BCC Elections Bring Out The Youth Vote</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=169</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=169</comments><description>&lt;img src=&quot;youthvote1.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;youthvote2.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;youthvote3.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
This should be a warning to all parents against letting an election junkie babysit children on an election day.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:10:33 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>Brisbane City Council Prediction</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=168</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=168</comments><description>The race for Australia&apos;s biggest city council, Brisbane, will be held on Saturday.  Campbell Newman, the Liberal&apos;s top ranked politician in Australia is hoping to be re-elected as well as ending Labor&apos;s hold on the council chamber.  &lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
My prediction is that he will smash Labor and end their 18 year? council domination by gaining five seats to form a majority.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Labor is only running a half hearted campaign.  No one at work could even name their mayoral candidate.</description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:07:15 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>Australia&apos;s Most Notorious Justice Minister</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=167</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=167</comments><description>Former New South Wales &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nla.gov.au/pub/nlanews/2001/jul01/johnley.html&quot;&gt;Justice Minister Thomas Ley&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Was charged with attempting to bribe his Labor opponent Fred McDonald.  McDonald mysteriously &quot;disappeared&quot; and the charges were dropped.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Ley critic Hyman Goldstein (Member for Coogee) was found dead after apparently &quot;falling&quot; from cliffs.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Keith Greedor was investigating the previous death but, whilst travelling by boat, he fell overboard and drowned.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Convicted of the Murder of John McBain Mudie, who he thought was having an affair with his mistress.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
He died in Broadmoor Asylum, England in 1947.</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:41:16 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>Australian Politics Sites Blocked by Iran</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=166</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=166</comments><description>While browsing the Iranian Web I became curious as to which sites are blocked, and which aren&apos;t.  Rating the blockage level is complicated because a site will be banned then work half an hour later.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
The site most disliked by the Iranian Government is.. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.andrewlanderyou.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;The Other Cheek - Andrew Landeryou&apos;s Blog of Freedom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Blocked 90% of the time:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.andrewlanderyou.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;The Other Cheek - Andrew Landeryou&apos;s Blog of Freedom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Blocked 80% of the time:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.polemica.info/&quot;&gt;Polemica&lt;/a&gt; (Unsure why)&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Blocked 70% of the time:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://awesternheart.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;A Western Heart&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://reasonsyouwillhateme.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Reasons You Will Hate Me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://queerpenguin.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Queer Penguin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kevgillett.net/&quot;&gt;Kev Gillett&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://kalimna.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Harry Clarke (Why ?)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/&quot;&gt;Andrew Bolt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;These sites are blocked 50% of the time:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://castironbalcony.media2.org/&quot;&gt;Blogger from the Cast Iron Balcony&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/&quot;&gt;News.Com.Au&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/&quot;&gt;The Age&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heraldsun.com.au/&quot;&gt;The Herald Sun&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/&quot;&gt;The Sydney Morning Herald&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kadaitcha.com/&quot;&gt;Kadaitcha&lt;/a&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;The below sites always work:  (There will be some disappointed bloggers here I&apos;m sure)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
A Better World: Graeme Bird For High Office&lt;P&gt;
Ambit Gambit&lt;P&gt;
Ampersand Duck&lt;P&gt;
Andrew Leigh&lt;P&gt;
Andrew Norton&lt;P&gt;
Antony Loewenstein&lt;P&gt;
armagnac&apos;d&lt;P&gt;
Australian Politics&lt;P&gt;
Austrolabe&lt;P&gt;
Balneus&lt;P&gt;
Barista&lt;P&gt;
Bastards Inc.&lt;P&gt;
Beelzebublog&lt;P&gt;
Beyond The Fringe&lt;P&gt;
Bilegrip&lt;P&gt;
Blogocracy&lt;P&gt;
catallaxy&lt;P&gt;
CoreEcon&lt;P&gt;
Counteract Now: Where The Right Is Not Right&lt;P&gt;
crazybrave&lt;P&gt;
CROSS-WIRE&lt;P&gt;
Daily Flute&lt;P&gt;
Decomposing Trees&lt;P&gt;
Deltoid&lt;P&gt;
Dennis Shanahan&lt;P&gt;
DogfightAtBankstown&lt;P&gt;
DUCKPOND&lt;P&gt;
election2007&lt;P&gt;
event mechanics&lt;P&gt;
Fair Crack of the Whip&lt;P&gt;
Father Bob&lt;P&gt;
For Battle!&lt;P&gt;
GordonMoyes.com&lt;P&gt;
GrodsCorp  Politics&lt;P&gt;
HarrangueMan&lt;P&gt;
Henry Thornton Blogs&lt;P&gt;
Hoyden About Town&lt;P&gt;
Hyperidian Bannerman&lt;P&gt;
Jennifer Marohasy&lt;P&gt;
John Barrdear&lt;P&gt;
John Howard: War Criminal&lt;P&gt;
John Quiggin&lt;P&gt;
Kerplunk - Common sense from Down Under&lt;P&gt;
Larvatus Prodeo&lt;P&gt;
LeftClick&lt;P&gt;
Leftwrites&lt;P&gt;
man of lettuce&lt;P&gt;
mark lawrence&lt;P&gt;
Matt Price&lt;P&gt;
Max Baumann&lt;P&gt;
Meganomics&lt;P&gt;
mgk: Machine Gun Keyboard&lt;P&gt;
Moral Dilemma&lt;P&gt;
Oz Conservative&lt;P&gt;
Oz Politics&lt;P&gt;
OzDemocracy&lt;P&gt;
Parliamentary Library Web Site Publications&lt;P&gt;
Paul Kelly&lt;P&gt;
personal political&lt;P&gt;
Peter Martin&lt;P&gt;
Planet Irf&lt;P&gt;
Possums Pollytics&lt;P&gt;
Random Brainwave&lt;P&gt;
Rank and Vile&lt;P&gt;
ROCKET&lt;P&gt;
Rudd Watch&lt;P&gt;
Sachi&apos;s hyperbolic space&lt;P&gt;
simon jackman&apos;s blog&lt;P&gt;
Slattsnews&lt;P&gt;
South Sea Republic&lt;P&gt;
Stephen Lloyd&lt;P&gt;
stoush.net - stoushing since 2005&lt;P&gt;
Suki Has An Opinion&lt;P&gt;
The Adventures of QueerPenguin&lt;P&gt;
The All New An Onymous Lefty&lt;P&gt;
The Dog&apos;s Bollocks&lt;P&gt;
The Killfile&lt;P&gt;
The Legal Soapbox&lt;P&gt;
The Orstrahyun&lt;P&gt;
The Piping Shrike&lt;P&gt;
The Poll Bludger&lt;P&gt;
The Raving Wingnut&lt;P&gt;
The Road to Surfdom&lt;P&gt;
The Thinkers&apos; Podium&lt;P&gt;
The View From Benambra - Original content - hah!&lt;P&gt;
There Aint no Sanity Clause&lt;P&gt;
thesouthcoast&lt;P&gt;
Thoughts on Freedom&lt;P&gt;
Tim Blair&lt;P&gt;
Tug Boat Potemkin&lt;P&gt;
Upperhouse.info&lt;P&gt;
Webdiary - Founded and Inspired by Margo Kingston - Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent&lt;P&gt;
Your Democracy - democracy is not a spectator sport&lt;P&gt;
YOUR NEW REALITY</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:34:46 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>Homespun Folksey Presidents</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=165</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=165</comments><description>Never forget - for some strange reason Americans love homespun folksey presidents.  Why is beyond me.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
McCain has that all over his opponents and gives the Republicans a big advantage over his Democrat rivals.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Obama can out &quot;homespun folksey&quot; Romney so the Republicans are in trouble if he wins the nomination.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
This is a purely superficial observation and is probably rubbish but does go a long way towards explaining every president back to Jimmy Carter.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
PS: I&apos;m still in Iran but trying to follow the action from the unblocked websites.&lt;P&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:57:52 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>Notice</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=164</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=164</comments><description>I&apos;ll be on a project in Iran for the next month so activity here is going to be quite slow.&lt;P&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:26:20 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>A Rare Presidential Election</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=163</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=163</comments><description>I love the US Presidential Elections. &lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
You have the staggered party &quot;Primaries&quot; then the real election.  Dozens of mini-elections. &lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
First off the mark are the Iowa Caucases in a week&apos;s time, then comes the New Hampshire primaries.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
This is an unusual presidential race because normally we have either a sitting President or Vice President running as candidate.  With none in the race we have large open fields on both sides.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
When was the last time that happened ?  I decided to do some research:&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
2004: GWB&lt;P&gt;
2000: Gore (VP)&lt;P&gt;
1996: Clinton&lt;P&gt;
1992: GB snr&lt;P&gt;
1988: GB snr (VP)&lt;P&gt;
1984: Reagan&lt;P&gt;
1980: Carter&lt;P&gt;
1976: Ford&lt;P&gt;
1972: Nixon (VP)&lt;P&gt;
1968: Johnson (withdrew from race after poor primary results)&lt;P&gt;
1964: Johnson&lt;P&gt;
1960: Nixon (VP)&lt;P&gt;
1956: Eisenhower&lt;P&gt;
1952: Truman (withdrew from race after poor primary results)&lt;P&gt;
1948: Truman &lt;P&gt;
1944: Roosevelt&lt;P&gt;
1940: Roosevelt&lt;P&gt;
1936: Roosevelt&lt;P&gt;
1932: Hoover&lt;P&gt;
1928: Coolidge and VP Dawes didn&apos;t re-contest&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
So 1928 !&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Update&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
This has &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election%2C_2008&quot;&gt;already been noticed&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:00:09 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>Senate Magnum Opus</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=162</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=162</comments><description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;UPDATE&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
I forgot to mention the ACT.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
The ACT has a quota of 33% and only elects two senators.  (100/(2+1))&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
The key battle here is between the Liberals and the Greens for the second seat.  &lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
The Liberals are only receiving preferences from the LDP, so need to reach 33% off their primary in order to hold their seat.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Unlike other senators, ACT senators are only elected for one term and take their seat immediately rather than July next year, so if the Greens won, the BOP would change in time for a Rudd government.  We&apos;ll know on Saturday night.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
I am going to tip the Liberals. The Liberals have a minimum, rock-bottom vote and I think it&apos;ll be above 33%.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;END UPDATE&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Democrats&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Andrew Bartlett in Queensland has the best chance of any Democrat of being elected (the others have no chance), however I still can&apos;t see him retaining his seat.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
There are only two ways he can get elected: by getting a higher vote than the Greens, or getting a higher vote than Pauline Hanson.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Neither of these results is likely.  History shows the Democrats get a much lower vote than the senate polls suggest, while history shows Pauline gets higher than polls suggest.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Bartlett didn&apos;t negotiate good preference deals.  The only party putting him high is the Climate Change Coalition, so he won&apos;t be able to ride preferences and will have to rely on his questionable primary vote.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
He&apos;s run a good campaign.  I&apos;ve seen more Democrats material than Greens.  I haven&apos;t seen a single Greens sign or received a single leaflet in my letter box.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
I&apos;ve received one Democrats leaflet,(sent much too early), and saw a Democrats sign towed behind a bike.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Unfortunately the Democrats are a tainted brand and this is the last election they will be taken semi-seriously.  Micro-party status is the future.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Primary vote: 2.5%&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Greens&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Despite many pundits speculating that The Greens primary vote will fall, they are in a much better position than 2004 due to better preference arrangements.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
The Democrats 2% is very useful, plus a nation-wide Labor deal puts them in a strong position for the third &apos;left&apos; seat in each state.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Unlike most pundits, I am going to predict that the Greens don&apos;t take any conservative senate seats.  The Liberals will get their third seats on conservative Minor/Micro preferences.  I can&apos;t see &quot;the combined Right&quot; getting less than 43% of the combined vote.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Greens State by state probabilities&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Tasmania: 100%,  Second seat: 5%.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;West Australia: 80%, Will miss out if Labor gets near 43%.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;New South Wales: 60%, Will miss out if Labor gets near 43%, and the LDP could starve their preferences similar to LFF in 2004.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Victoria: 70%, Will miss out if Labor gets near 43%.  More likely than NSW due to higher primary vote.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;South Australia: 55%, Xenophon makes this a weird senate race.  A number of scenarios I&apos;ve run don&apos;t turn into a Green victory.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Queensland: 50%, Depends on Pauline as she may elect the third Labor candidate.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;P&gt;
This election looks good for the Greens.  I&apos;m going to predict 4 senators.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Family First&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
In general, Family First&apos;s chances rely on getting ahead of the coaliton, which only happens if the Liberal excess is less than half a quota (ie Coalition senate vote &lt;= 35.5%).  &lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Family First should be praying the Liberals get absolutely thumped.  &lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Family First State by State probabilities&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Queensland: 50%, the maths is simple, if they get in front of Pauline, they win a seat (and so do the Greens).&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;South Australia: 40%, if they maintain their state election result, and Xenophon pushes the Liberal low, they win a seat.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Victoria: 25%, if they maintain their state election result, and Liberal excess is less than half a quota (ie 35.5%) they win a seat.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Western Australia: 8%, Can win if they get 1% ahead of the CDP and Coalition vote below 37%&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Tasmania: 0%, no micros means no harvest&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;New South Wales: 0%, their weakest state&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Nick Xenophon&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Xenophon&apos;s candidacy has thrown a hand-grenade into the South Australian Senate race.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Xenophon himself is a shoe-in, and will probably take a seat from the Right.  The more interesting aspect of his presence is how much vote the other parties will lose to him.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
From my South Australia 2006 analysis of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=35&quot;&gt;Xenophon desertion rates&lt;/a&gt; it can be seen that some party&apos;s voters are more loyal than others.  Many young Greens voters may be attracted by Xenophon&apos;s quirky style and drastically affect their primary senate vote.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Xenophon isn&apos;t receiving many preferences and is unlikely to get his second candidate elected unless his vote is near 28%.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Queensland Musings&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Queensland is a tricky one.  &lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Family First have broken the One Nation/Pauline nexus, which was an important source of preferences for her.  &lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
One Nation had a senator up for re-election in 2004 and are likely to lose half their vote, but still get above 1%, which is huge in senate terms.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
The Maths for Queensland is this:&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;IF Coalition &gt; 41% THEN&lt;P&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;3-3  or 3-2-1&lt;P&gt;
ELSE IF FF + ONP + GrpX + FishLife &gt; Pauline + NonCust + Shoot + LDP THEN&lt;P&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;2-2-1-1&lt;P&gt;
ELSE&lt;P&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;3-3&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
If Family First don&apos;t absorb Pauline&apos;s preferences, they get unleashed to the Labor Party, locking the Greens out of contention, and electing Labor to the 3rd Left Seat for the first time in Queensland since the six seat senate was created.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Potential Micro Harvests&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
The chances of Micro Harvests are often overstated due to over-estimation of Micro Party percentages.  The chance of a Micro getting 1% is very very slim.  Micro results are normally 0.5% or below.  GROUP A,B,C etc should be 0.1%.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;The Liberty and Democracy Party&lt;/b&gt; in New South Wales is the biggest chance.  It&apos;s freaky how with semi-realistic numbers they get elected. &lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
It&apos;s still highly unlikely due to the incredible number of micro preferences they are relying on to make up their numbers.  &lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
The LDP also stuffed up their paper work so only the acronym &quot;LDP&quot; will appear on the Ballot paper.  A HUGE mistake.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
If I was Terje Peterson, I&apos;d mortgage the house and buy some TV time.  This chance won&apos;t come again.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Personally I don&apos;t like some of their policies, such as Guns (too easy) and Drugs (too easy).  I&apos;d rather live in a safe, slightly less free society.  So I&apos;m hoping they don&apos;t win, despite their excellent free trade economic policies and my admiration of Ayn Rand&apos;s writing.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;The CDP in WA&lt;/b&gt; have a harvest ready if the Liberal vote drops below 37%.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:19:34 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>James Baker YouTube</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=161</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=161</comments><description>Queensland Independent Senate Candidate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2007/s1869432.htm&quot;&gt;James Baker&lt;/a&gt; has picked up some campaign tricks from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xen.net.au/&quot;&gt;Nick Xenophon&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/qEmM1yHjaXw&amp;rel=1&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/qEmM1yHjaXw&amp;rel=1&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;355&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:32:48 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>New Democrats Commercial</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=160</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=160</comments><description>What do you guys think of &lt;a href=&quot;http://media01.couriermail.com.au/multimedia/mediaplayer/index.html?id=551&quot; target=_top&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; ?&lt;P&gt;
</description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:15:34 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>ABC Senate Calculators</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=159</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=159</comments><description>Antony Green has created some wonderful &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2b.abc.net.au/Elections/View/SenateCalculator.aspx?e=1&amp;ca=qld&quot;&gt;Senate Calculators&lt;/a&gt; for us to play with.&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;

Should I still bother with mine ?&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;

Interestingly, the very first time I ran it for Queensland, the result was 2 Labor, 2 Liberal, 1 Green and 1 Family First.&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;

Someone critique my estimated vote figures:&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;

&lt;table&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;Party&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;% Votes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Liberal/National Coalition&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	37.90%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Australian Labor Party&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	35.93%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;The Greens&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	7.00%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Family First&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	4.50%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Pauline&apos;s United Australia&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	5.00%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Australian Democrats&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	2.20%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;One Nation&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	1.50%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;The Fishing Party&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	1.28%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;What Women Want&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	1.00%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Liberty and Democracy Party&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	0.90%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Australian Fishing and Lifestyle Party&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	0.70%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;D.L.P. - Democratic Labor Party&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;%	0.50%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Carers Alliance&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;%	0.40%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Climate Change Coalition&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	0.40%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Christian Democratic Party&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	0.30%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Non-Custodial Parents Party&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	0.19%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Citizens Electoral Council&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	0.15%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Socialist Alliance&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	0.10%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Senator On-Line&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;% 	0.05%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;
I suspect I&apos;ve been miserly with Pauline&apos;s first preference vote ?&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;UPDATE&lt;/b&gt;
Nope, I&apos;ve tried it a few times. If FF get in front of Pauline they win.&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;

&lt;b&gt;UPDATE&lt;/b&gt;
Checking South Australia, currently predicting a Green/Xenophon win there.&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;

Nick Xenophon&apos;s preference negotiation skills haven&apos;t improved since the South Australian election.  &lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;
I gave him 10% yet he struggles to be elected.  He receives almost zero Micro preferences and is the last candidate elected despite receiving twice the Green vote in my estimates.  
&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;UPDATE&lt;/b&gt;
There&apos;s a chance of either an LDP or CDP Harvest in New South Wales.  A couple of scenarios I&apos;ve tried produced wins from these parties, especially with really low coaliton primary votes.
&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The LDP also choke off the flow of preferences to Kerry Nettle, similar to the Liberals for Forests in NSW in 2004.
&lt;P&gt;&lt;P&gt;
</description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:12:17 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>Queensland Senate Tickets</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=158</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=158</comments><description>The senate tickets are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aec.gov.au/Elections/federal_elections/2007/candidates/index.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
I will be putting my idle thoughts on what I see in this thread as I go through them.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Contenders: Labor, Coalition, Family First, Greens and Pauline.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Initial thoughts:&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
The Greens have put Family First ahead of the Coalition.  The favour has not been returned.&lt;P&gt;
This is a massive boost to Family First&apos;s prospects in the competiton with Ron Boswell, however I&apos;m still looking.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Family First have the Democrats last, with the Greens second last.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Family First&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Coalition&lt;P&gt;
Pauline&lt;P&gt;
Labor &lt;P&gt;
Greens&lt;P&gt;
Democrats&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Democrats&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Greens&lt;P&gt;
Labor&lt;P&gt;
Coalition&lt;P&gt;
Family First&lt;P&gt;
Pauline&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Coalition&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Family First&lt;P&gt;
Democrats&lt;P&gt;
Greens&lt;P&gt;
Labor&lt;P&gt;
Pauline&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Labor&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;P&gt;
Greens&lt;P&gt;
Democrats&lt;P&gt;
Family First&lt;P&gt;
Coalition&lt;P&gt;
Pauline&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Greens&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;P&gt;
Democrats&lt;P&gt;
Labor&lt;P&gt;
Family First&lt;P&gt;
Coalition&lt;P&gt;
Pauline&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Pauline&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Family First&lt;P&gt;
Democrats&lt;P&gt;
Labor&lt;P&gt;
Coalition&lt;P&gt;
Greens&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
</description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:15:02 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>Candidate Analysis</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=157</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=157</comments><description>The beauty of SQL..&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Candidates per Party - Entire Country&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;GRN	150&lt;P&gt;
ALP	145&lt;P&gt;
LP	132&lt;P&gt;
FFP	129&lt;P&gt;
IND	102&lt;P&gt;
DEM	86&lt;P&gt;
CEC	81&lt;P&gt;
CDP	63&lt;P&gt;
LDP	47&lt;P&gt;
NP	24&lt;P&gt;
ONWA	23&lt;P&gt;
SAL	17&lt;P&gt;
HAN	12&lt;P&gt;
SEP	9&lt;P&gt;
CCC	7&lt;P&gt;
CLR	5&lt;P&gt;
	4&lt;P&gt;
DLP	4&lt;P&gt;
WWW	4&lt;P&gt;
CCE	4&lt;P&gt;
NCP	2&lt;P&gt;
CLP	2&lt;P&gt;
FPY	2&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Candidates per Party - ACT&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;ACT	ALP	2&lt;P&gt;
ACT	CEC	2&lt;P&gt;
ACT	GRN	2&lt;P&gt;
ACT	LP	2&lt;P&gt;
ACT	IND	1&lt;P&gt;
ACT	DEM	1&lt;P&gt;
ACT	SAL	1&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Candidates per Party - NSW&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;NSW	GRN	49&lt;P&gt;
NSW	ALP	44&lt;P&gt;
NSW	CDP	44&lt;P&gt;
NSW	LP	40&lt;P&gt;
NSW	IND	38&lt;P&gt;
NSW	FFP	32&lt;P&gt;
NSW	CEC	24&lt;P&gt;
NSW	DEM	12&lt;P&gt;
NSW	LDP	12&lt;P&gt;
NSW	NP	9&lt;P&gt;
NSW	HAN	8&lt;P&gt;
NSW	CCC	7&lt;P&gt;
NSW	SEP	6&lt;P&gt;
NSW	SAL	5&lt;P&gt;
NSW	CLR	5&lt;P&gt;
NSW	CCE	3&lt;P&gt;
NSW		3&lt;P&gt;
NSW	NCP	2&lt;P&gt;
NSW	FPY	1&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Candidates per Party - NT&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;NT	IND	3&lt;P&gt;
NT	GRN	2&lt;P&gt;
NT	CLP	2&lt;P&gt;
NT	ALP	2&lt;P&gt;
NT	CEC	1&lt;P&gt;
NT	LDP	1&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Candidates per Party - QLD&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;QLD	GRN	29&lt;P&gt;
QLD	DEM	29&lt;P&gt;
QLD	FFP	29&lt;P&gt;
QLD	ALP	29&lt;P&gt;
QLD	IND	26&lt;P&gt;
QLD	LP	24&lt;P&gt;
QLD	CEC	14&lt;P&gt;
QLD	LDP	12&lt;P&gt;
QLD	NP	10&lt;P&gt;
QLD	ONWA	8&lt;P&gt;
QLD	SAL	3&lt;P&gt;
QLD	CDP	2&lt;P&gt;
QLD	FPY	1&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Candidates per Party - SA&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;SA	FFP	11&lt;P&gt;
SA	DEM	11&lt;P&gt;
SA	ALP	11&lt;P&gt;
SA	LP	11&lt;P&gt;
SA	GRN	11&lt;P&gt;
SA	LDP	6&lt;P&gt;
SA	IND	5&lt;P&gt;
SA	HAN	3&lt;P&gt;
SA	NP	2&lt;P&gt;
SA	WWW	2&lt;P&gt;
SA	CCE	1&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Candidates per Party - TAS&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;TAS	ALP	5&lt;P&gt;
TAS	CEC	5&lt;P&gt;
TAS	FFP	5&lt;P&gt;
TAS	LP	5&lt;P&gt;
TAS	GRN	5&lt;P&gt;
TAS	IND	2&lt;P&gt;
TAS	LDP	2&lt;P&gt;
TAS	SAL	2&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Candidates per Party - VIC&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;VIC	GRN	37&lt;P&gt;
VIC	FFP	37&lt;P&gt;
VIC	ALP	37&lt;P&gt;
VIC	LP	35&lt;P&gt;
VIC	DEM	33&lt;P&gt;
VIC	CEC	22&lt;P&gt;
VIC	IND	17&lt;P&gt;
VIC	LDP	8&lt;P&gt;
VIC	DLP	4&lt;P&gt;
VIC	SAL	3&lt;P&gt;
VIC	SEP	2&lt;P&gt;
VIC	CDP	2&lt;P&gt;
VIC	NP	2&lt;P&gt;
VIC	HAN	1&lt;P&gt;
VIC		1&lt;P&gt;
VIC	WWW	1&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Candidates per Party - WA&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;WA	CDP	15&lt;P&gt;
WA	ALP	15&lt;P&gt;
WA	FFP	15&lt;P&gt;
WA	ONWA	15&lt;P&gt;
WA	LP	15&lt;P&gt;
WA	GRN	15&lt;P&gt;
WA	CEC	13&lt;P&gt;
WA	IND	10&lt;P&gt;
WA	LDP	6&lt;P&gt;
WA	SAL	3&lt;P&gt;
WA	WWW	1&lt;P&gt;
WA	SEP	1&lt;P&gt;
WA	NP      1&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
One Nation seems to be using One Nation WA&apos;s party status in Queensland to get on the ballot paper.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;UPDATE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
No Democrats in WA.&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;b&gt;UPDATE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Reader &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=157&quot;&gt;Polly has noticed something unusual&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;in the senate in Victoria, there is a One Nation Party group registered (they got the 2nd position on the ballot paper), but there is also a One Nation WA candidate running for the senate in Victoria by himself, so he&apos;ll be listed with the three other ungrouped candidates running for the senate.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 01:44:22 +1000</pubDate></item><item><title>Candidates.. waiting ..waiting</title><link>http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=156</link><comments>http://www.upperhouse.info/comments.aspx?CommentId=156</comments><description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aec.gov.au/Elections/federal_elections/2007/&quot;&gt;candidates list&lt;/a&gt; is still not working.  Maybe they&apos;re waiting for 12PM in Western Australia ?&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:40:29 +1000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>